Ah, cycling. My favorite of the three triathlon disciplines. Not because I'm fast, or strong, or climb well. I'm not any of that. I like cycling because it's just plain *fun*! Swimming can get a bit boring and repetitive, while running has always been an exercise in pain tolerance for me. Cycling on the other hand, brings me back to my childhood when all I needed was my trusty bike and the world was mine.
Cycling gives immediate gratification for hard work. Pedaling hard? You're rewarded with the wind in your hair and the world passing you by at 25 mph. Big climb? Look forward to an exhilarating downhill where even your inner speed demon comes face to face with cold hard fear. When I'm zooming down a hill at over 35 mph, all that's running through my mind is *Omg*, pleeeze let there be no loose gravel, sand, crazy drivers, or sudden gusts of wind. But... Oh. WhatARush!
Before last year, the last time I had ridden a bike regularly was back in college in the early 90s. I had a white Schwinn 10-speed. It had brake levers on both the curvy and straight parts of the handlebars so I could brake with my hands in either position. The two gear shift levers were located right where the handlebars met the frame, in the center of the bike. I loved that thing.
Fast forward 20 years. Deb, my friend from work who is a cyclist meets me at the house of somebody from her cycling club who was selling his racing bike. He brings it out.
It only had one set of brakes, located on the curvy part of the handlebars. Ok. No biggie. I can learn to ride like that.
It also had clipless pedals. Ok. I've vaguely heard about those too. Something about special shoes that actually attach to special pedals so that you can pull up as well as push down. I can learn how to ride with that too. (Most people will fall at least once while learning how to ride clipless... all the while looking like a complete idiot. It's a right of passage.)
It wasn't until I started test riding the bike when I realized that I had no idea how to shift gears. The two familiar shift levers are nowhere to be found.. "Push in your brakes," Deb said. Whaaa? Turns out you squeeze the brakes to stop, but you push the entire brake inwards to shift gears in one direction, and push this other little paddle next to the brake to shift in the other direction. This way, you can shift without ever moving your hands. Genius!
Knowing absolutely nothing about bikes, I bought this one based entirely on Deb's say so. :)
A year later, I still know very little about bikes. I couldn't point out the "bottom bracket" if my life depended on it, for example... and I do know enough to know that is an embarrassing admission. (Deb finally pointed it out to me today after I told her about this blog.) I thought it might have been interesting to share a little of what I *have* learned. Maybe explain the differences between aluminum, carbon, and titanium frames. Between Campagnolo, Shimano, and SRAM components. Between a road bike and a triathlon/time trail bike. Then I realized that to try to do all of that would take up more space than most of you probably have the patience or interest to read.
Let's just say that if you enjoy shopping, or love reading about or drooling over the latest gadgets and toys, then cycling is your sport, my friend. The easiest way I can explain buying a new high end bike is that it's very much like buying a new computer. You can either buy one prebuilt from a company like Dell, or you can buy all the parts separately and built it yourself. But even Dell allows you to customize your machine by upgrading the processor, or memory, video card, or whatever. Bike makers are like that too, except instead of CPU, memory or video, you select components like derailleurs, cranksets, and shifters that come in a wide variety of quality, materials, weight, and prices. People will often keep the same frame and just upgrade components as the years go by instead of replacing the entire bike. To take the analogy further, just like in the old days when you could not mix and match Apple and PC parts, or Canon and Nikon lenses, cyclists must choose between Italian Campagnolo ("Campy") or Japanese Shimano components.
See, I'm already boring you. Suffice it to say that these are not your father's 10-speeds. They are mechanical marvels that can cost upwards of $8-10k new if you want to ride like Lance Armstrong. Ya. For a fricken bicycle! (The fact that it is even within the realm of possibility to ride what Lance rides is kinda amazing. Imagine being able to take Jimmie Johnson's race car out for a spin every weekend!) I think it's pretty clear now that cycling is not a cheap sport. One wheel alone could run you more than $2k if you want to get fancy and have money to burn. When you're driving around on the weekend, most of the bikes that you see on the road ridden by anyone wearing a cycling outfit will range anywhere between $1k - $6k new.
[Incidentally, there's a reason why we wear those outfits. Chaffing. Ass padding. Aerodynamic. Once upon a time, I made fun of these cycling weenies. Not anymore. :) ]
That all said, don't let any of this scare you away from triathlons! As Lance himself has famously said, it's not about the bike. It really isn't. I estimate that the vast majority of cyclists out there (certainly including myself) are not at the level where they can fully appreciate the awesomeness of their bike. Much to my friend Gary's dismay, that used bike I bought had full Dura-Ace, which is top of the line Shimano. *Com.plete.ly* wasted on me. I'd venture that most riders in my cycling club could kick my ass on a $100 Huffy purchased at Walmart.
All you need to finish a tri is a working bike with two wheels. Don't have one? Borrow one. Or buy a $50 clunker off Craigslist. I've seen grown men ride BMX bikes in the shorter races. Mountain bikes or hybrids are more common than you think. People aren't going to think any less of you for showing up at a race with a mountain bike. If after a race or two, you decide to get more serious about this whole triathlon thing, you can start thinking about getting a road bike. Or maybe even a time trial bike. The important thing is to just get out there and do it. :)
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Monday, December 28, 2009
On Swimming...
Let's face it. Everybody can run. Most people know how to ride a bike. But the main reason why more people don't try triathlons is because of the swim. Either they flat out don't know how, or can't fathom having to swim longer than a length of a pool in one go. It's intimidating.
I came into swimming very late. This year, actually. Ya, I was able to simulate a poor approximation of the freestyle stroke. But the fact that I was only ever able to go 25 yards at a time before completely running out of breath meant only one thing. I was doing it wrong.
[Literally doing it wrong. Swimming is less about fitness than it is about how efficiently you can pull your body through water. It's a very technical sport... kinda like how golf is a technical sport. A nice effortless golf swing, when done right, will send the ball hundreds of yards. Swimming is like that. A nice efficient freestyle makes you tired like walking makes you tired. You gotta swim a loong time before you need to stop. Any extra effort put into your stroke will only be wasted energy if your technique is not right.]
I've always regretted never really learning how to swim, so late last year I finally decided to do something about it... and signed up for my first triathlon in March. Huh? See, that's how I roll. Commit to the crazy goal first, then figure out how to do it. This race had a very short 150 meter pool swim, so I figured I should be able to go from 25m to 150m in 4 months. 16 swim classes and 3x a week practice sessions later at the gym, I was there! Barely. I wanna say that I swam those 150m nonstop on race day, but let's just say I was very glad the pool was only 50m long!
So naturally, I signed up for 3 more triathlons with swims of 500m in April, 1000m in May, and 1500m in June. All open water swims in a lake, so no stopping this time. When the farthest you're able to swim is 150m, 500m seems pretty daunting, while 1500m might as well be the entire Pacific Ocean. Again, it was one of those instances of commit first, figure it out later.
I did figure it out! I "found" my stroke, the stroke I could maintain almost indefinitely, sometime between the 500m and the 1000m races. Problem is, it's ass slow. How slow? In the last Olympic distance race with the 1500m swim, I came in 289 out of 295 men and women of all ages (some well into their 70s) in the swim. That's the bottom 2%! And get this. At 42 minutes, it was the fastest 1500m I had ever swam. You know what? I'm not even embarrassed because I knew I had come a long way. I'm now past the point of simple moral victories, though.
The Ironman swim distance is 2.4 miles, or 3862 meters. With the way I swim in open water with no pool lanes to guide my way, I'll prolly get lost and end up swimming some extra... let's call it 4000m. That's 2 hours at my current pace. The swim cutoff for the IM is 2:20, so 2 hours is cutting it close. The top age groupers swim it in an hour. Something is still obviously not right with my stroke. I'd love to be able to swim 4000m in 1:30 or less by next November's IM.
Time to get to work.
[For those of you who need more inspiration, a friend of mine did not know how to swim *at all*, and ended up finishing an Ironman with the 2.4 mile swim less than a year after taking his first lesson. No excuses, guys. Just do it.]
I came into swimming very late. This year, actually. Ya, I was able to simulate a poor approximation of the freestyle stroke. But the fact that I was only ever able to go 25 yards at a time before completely running out of breath meant only one thing. I was doing it wrong.
[Literally doing it wrong. Swimming is less about fitness than it is about how efficiently you can pull your body through water. It's a very technical sport... kinda like how golf is a technical sport. A nice effortless golf swing, when done right, will send the ball hundreds of yards. Swimming is like that. A nice efficient freestyle makes you tired like walking makes you tired. You gotta swim a loong time before you need to stop. Any extra effort put into your stroke will only be wasted energy if your technique is not right.]
I've always regretted never really learning how to swim, so late last year I finally decided to do something about it... and signed up for my first triathlon in March. Huh? See, that's how I roll. Commit to the crazy goal first, then figure out how to do it. This race had a very short 150 meter pool swim, so I figured I should be able to go from 25m to 150m in 4 months. 16 swim classes and 3x a week practice sessions later at the gym, I was there! Barely. I wanna say that I swam those 150m nonstop on race day, but let's just say I was very glad the pool was only 50m long!
So naturally, I signed up for 3 more triathlons with swims of 500m in April, 1000m in May, and 1500m in June. All open water swims in a lake, so no stopping this time. When the farthest you're able to swim is 150m, 500m seems pretty daunting, while 1500m might as well be the entire Pacific Ocean. Again, it was one of those instances of commit first, figure it out later.
I did figure it out! I "found" my stroke, the stroke I could maintain almost indefinitely, sometime between the 500m and the 1000m races. Problem is, it's ass slow. How slow? In the last Olympic distance race with the 1500m swim, I came in 289 out of 295 men and women of all ages (some well into their 70s) in the swim. That's the bottom 2%! And get this. At 42 minutes, it was the fastest 1500m I had ever swam. You know what? I'm not even embarrassed because I knew I had come a long way. I'm now past the point of simple moral victories, though.
The Ironman swim distance is 2.4 miles, or 3862 meters. With the way I swim in open water with no pool lanes to guide my way, I'll prolly get lost and end up swimming some extra... let's call it 4000m. That's 2 hours at my current pace. The swim cutoff for the IM is 2:20, so 2 hours is cutting it close. The top age groupers swim it in an hour. Something is still obviously not right with my stroke. I'd love to be able to swim 4000m in 1:30 or less by next November's IM.
Time to get to work.
[For those of you who need more inspiration, a friend of mine did not know how to swim *at all*, and ended up finishing an Ironman with the 2.4 mile swim less than a year after taking his first lesson. No excuses, guys. Just do it.]
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Overheard in an old school Civic...
...somewhere in LA.
Me: (trying to be funny) "You know, the last time I've had to roll up the window by hand like this was over 15 years ago."
Friend: (as I shut the door and started walking away) "Umm, you remember how to lock the door by hand too, right?"
Me: (trying to be funny) "You know, the last time I've had to roll up the window by hand like this was over 15 years ago."
Friend: (as I shut the door and started walking away) "Umm, you remember how to lock the door by hand too, right?"
Monday, November 16, 2009
Jack And Jill Went Up The Hill...
"Jack & Jill"
Definition: A contest where dancers are randomly paired up and asked to dance to randomly selected music. All the dancing is improvised. At its core, it's a contest of lead/follow skills and most importantly, music interpretation. Winners are selected by a panel of judges.
Westies sure love their Jack & Jills. In just a few months of West Coast Swing, I've watched more J&J contests than all of my 6+ years of salsa. Seems like most of the larger dance venues have some sort of contest lined up each week. One week one of these places was short guys, and I somehow got roped into a contest with my oh-so-impressive 5 pattern repertoire. The whole thing is kinda like how salsa clubs will soemtimes have a performance or two for whatever group or couple need a "live practice" before their big competition, except it happens a lot more frequently, and are generally loads more interesting to watch.
There's something about WCS and "WCS-able" music that makes it really well suited for this type of contest. I'm not gonna say that all salsa music is the same because it's not. Some songs definitely groove better than others, as some of you can attest to if you've ever heard me say, "Not this song" to a dance request. But for the most part, salsa can't compare to the huge variety of music to which you can dance WCS. Anything from hip hop and R&B to rock & roll to the blues. This is precisely the reason why WCS J&Js are so fun to watch. It's just really cool to see how couples interpret all these different types of music with no preparation at all. From the overall mood of the song to the breaks and the hits and even the lyrics... all come out in the dance. That's where the real talent lies. Most good dancers can lead and follow with no problem. But not every leader is equally good at pairing the dance to the music, and not every follow can react fast enough to play to, and even expand on, the leader's cues. When you watch WCS professionals do this, you're left with a sense of awe and wonderment. Often when I watch these vids on YouTube, there is a huge smile plastered on my face as I marvel at their talent.
How awesome would it be to be able to dance like *that*?
Watch the hat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkcHzqr8a34
Perfect music interpretation. Ben, the lead in this vid, teaches in LA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3toYxGlWxk
Deb used to teach at the Granada.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFNnjqqqjg4
Amazing follow here to match all that footwork. Doug teaches in LA. Tat is from SoCal too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCvP9fjXc8A
Definition: A contest where dancers are randomly paired up and asked to dance to randomly selected music. All the dancing is improvised. At its core, it's a contest of lead/follow skills and most importantly, music interpretation. Winners are selected by a panel of judges.
Westies sure love their Jack & Jills. In just a few months of West Coast Swing, I've watched more J&J contests than all of my 6+ years of salsa. Seems like most of the larger dance venues have some sort of contest lined up each week. One week one of these places was short guys, and I somehow got roped into a contest with my oh-so-impressive 5 pattern repertoire. The whole thing is kinda like how salsa clubs will soemtimes have a performance or two for whatever group or couple need a "live practice" before their big competition, except it happens a lot more frequently, and are generally loads more interesting to watch.
There's something about WCS and "WCS-able" music that makes it really well suited for this type of contest. I'm not gonna say that all salsa music is the same because it's not. Some songs definitely groove better than others, as some of you can attest to if you've ever heard me say, "Not this song" to a dance request. But for the most part, salsa can't compare to the huge variety of music to which you can dance WCS. Anything from hip hop and R&B to rock & roll to the blues. This is precisely the reason why WCS J&Js are so fun to watch. It's just really cool to see how couples interpret all these different types of music with no preparation at all. From the overall mood of the song to the breaks and the hits and even the lyrics... all come out in the dance. That's where the real talent lies. Most good dancers can lead and follow with no problem. But not every leader is equally good at pairing the dance to the music, and not every follow can react fast enough to play to, and even expand on, the leader's cues. When you watch WCS professionals do this, you're left with a sense of awe and wonderment. Often when I watch these vids on YouTube, there is a huge smile plastered on my face as I marvel at their talent.
How awesome would it be to be able to dance like *that*?
Watch the hat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkcHzqr8a34
Perfect music interpretation. Ben, the lead in this vid, teaches in LA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3toYxGlWxk
Deb used to teach at the Granada.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFNnjqqqjg4
Amazing follow here to match all that footwork. Doug teaches in LA. Tat is from SoCal too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCvP9fjXc8A
Monday, October 19, 2009
Cheating
About a month ago, I decided to start seeing West Coast Swing again. Sure we've flirted before, but it never really turned into anything serious. For one thing, I've been with Salsa for so long that it kinda felt like cheating. So it wasn't her. It was me. I didn't give her the chance she deserved.
Truth be told, I actually *love* WCS. Always have. Maybe even more than salsa, but don't tell her that! While salsa can sometimes feel like a frenetic roller coaster ride, WCS is more like a flirty stroll in the park. Salsa is heart pumping hot. WCS is playfully sexy. Also, the smooth nature of WCS fits so nicely with my lead style. Rather than sometimes forcing me to be somebody I'm not, WCS actually embraces who I am, and brings out a part of me that I really like. It's a strange thing to say about a dance, but there it is. :)
Salsa es Caliente!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t76xT26sQ5w
West Coast Swing is SEXY (note: these dances are lead/follow, not choreographed)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTwsoAC7qDs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3toYxGlWxk
WCS makes it so hard to love her sometimes though. Salsa is everywhere in LA. I see her all the time. So do my friends. WCS makes me drive 40 minutes west on Wednesdays just for a 2 hour date, and 40 minutes south on Sundays for a 4 hour tryst. It really takes dedication to want to be with WCS.
WCS also tends to attract an older crowd for some reason. Maybe it's because she tends to hang out with the not as cool crowd like Texas Two Step, Nightclub Two Step, and that cougar, Hustle. Salsa keeps company with fun and ever classy ChaChaCha, "I'm easy anybody can dance me" Merengue, and of course naughty Bachata. That's why I tend to dance with lots of girls in salsa, and lots of girls' mothers and grandmothers in WCS. Sigh.
But I think I'm ready to take the plunge. It's time to go with my heart and not with my head. Salsa will always be there, and I'll keep seeing her occasionally... but WCS and I have an understanding. An unspoken connection. She gets who I am. Who am I to deny that?
Truth be told, I actually *love* WCS. Always have. Maybe even more than salsa, but don't tell her that! While salsa can sometimes feel like a frenetic roller coaster ride, WCS is more like a flirty stroll in the park. Salsa is heart pumping hot. WCS is playfully sexy. Also, the smooth nature of WCS fits so nicely with my lead style. Rather than sometimes forcing me to be somebody I'm not, WCS actually embraces who I am, and brings out a part of me that I really like. It's a strange thing to say about a dance, but there it is. :)
Salsa es Caliente!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t76xT26sQ5w
West Coast Swing is SEXY (note: these dances are lead/follow, not choreographed)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTwsoAC7qDs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3toYxGlWxk
WCS makes it so hard to love her sometimes though. Salsa is everywhere in LA. I see her all the time. So do my friends. WCS makes me drive 40 minutes west on Wednesdays just for a 2 hour date, and 40 minutes south on Sundays for a 4 hour tryst. It really takes dedication to want to be with WCS.
WCS also tends to attract an older crowd for some reason. Maybe it's because she tends to hang out with the not as cool crowd like Texas Two Step, Nightclub Two Step, and that cougar, Hustle. Salsa keeps company with fun and ever classy ChaChaCha, "I'm easy anybody can dance me" Merengue, and of course naughty Bachata. That's why I tend to dance with lots of girls in salsa, and lots of girls' mothers and grandmothers in WCS. Sigh.
But I think I'm ready to take the plunge. It's time to go with my heart and not with my head. Salsa will always be there, and I'll keep seeing her occasionally... but WCS and I have an understanding. An unspoken connection. She gets who I am. Who am I to deny that?
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Filling in the Blanks
I was talking with a friend recently, comparing personal histories and whatnot... when I realized that there's still a few things I didn't know about myself. For example, I only had a vague idea of my life before the age of 4. Something about being sent to Taiwan a couple times... but I never really knew why, or for how long.
So I decided to fill in the blanks last night with my mom. Apparently, she brought me to Taiwan when I was three months old, and left me there with my grandmother and aunt until I was two!
Whaaa?!!
I can't imagine what it must have been like to be a brand new mother, and basically sending your newborn away for two years. That means my mom didn't get to see her only child's first steps or hear him say his first words! That's mind boggling. I also wonder what it must have been like to be placed in the position of having to send me away in the first place. She explained that with the hours she had to work (she was a nurse), she couldn't bear to keep waking me up at 4am each morning to take me to the baby sitter and leave me there until 5pm every day. She decided she would feel more at ease if she knew that either my grandmother or my aunt would be watching me 24/7, even if it meant sending me half a world away. So that's what she did.
[I'm wondering if there's more to the story than that. I also briefly wondered where my father was in all this that he couldn't help out with the baby... then quickly realized that this was my father I was wondering about.]
By the time my second 1.5 year tour of Taiwan ended, I was already five and a half. When my mom finally brought me back to the States for good, I had spent less than two years with her total. My very first memories are actually from that second stint in Taiwan, and i still remember that my mom was only a vague theoretical idea at the point. That the two women taking care of me were my grandmother and my aunt, but there was a woman out there in "Mei Guo" ("Beautiful Country" = what the Chinese call "America") who was my actual mother.
It was a strange concept to grasp for a five year old.
So I decided to fill in the blanks last night with my mom. Apparently, she brought me to Taiwan when I was three months old, and left me there with my grandmother and aunt until I was two!
Whaaa?!!
I can't imagine what it must have been like to be a brand new mother, and basically sending your newborn away for two years. That means my mom didn't get to see her only child's first steps or hear him say his first words! That's mind boggling. I also wonder what it must have been like to be placed in the position of having to send me away in the first place. She explained that with the hours she had to work (she was a nurse), she couldn't bear to keep waking me up at 4am each morning to take me to the baby sitter and leave me there until 5pm every day. She decided she would feel more at ease if she knew that either my grandmother or my aunt would be watching me 24/7, even if it meant sending me half a world away. So that's what she did.
[I'm wondering if there's more to the story than that. I also briefly wondered where my father was in all this that he couldn't help out with the baby... then quickly realized that this was my father I was wondering about.]
By the time my second 1.5 year tour of Taiwan ended, I was already five and a half. When my mom finally brought me back to the States for good, I had spent less than two years with her total. My very first memories are actually from that second stint in Taiwan, and i still remember that my mom was only a vague theoretical idea at the point. That the two women taking care of me were my grandmother and my aunt, but there was a woman out there in "Mei Guo" ("Beautiful Country" = what the Chinese call "America") who was my actual mother.
It was a strange concept to grasp for a five year old.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Living in a Tent
I was home one weekend in our old house in Syracuse cleaning out all my stuff. I found this essay and decided to digitize it for posterity. :)
(written in 6th grade)
I think living in a tent would be terrible. First of all, a tent does not have good bathroom faucilities. And a person would very likely feel cramped if he has to live in it for a whole year. Seconed of all, if your family ever go out, the tent is a perfect place for burglars to strike, or even animals too. Another bad thing about the tent is that no friends would live near you, the tent would also probrably be to far away to walk to school-- which I really like doing. There would be no room of my own and no room to do homework in . Some bad things about the tent itself is that the surface usually gets wet in the morning. It is very destructable also-- any strong wind can blow a tent down. These are some of the reasons I think living in a tent is terrible.
Living In a Tent
(written in 6th grade)
I think living in a tent would be terrible. First of all, a tent does not have good bathroom faucilities. And a person would very likely feel cramped if he has to live in it for a whole year. Seconed of all, if your family ever go out, the tent is a perfect place for burglars to strike, or even animals too. Another bad thing about the tent is that no friends would live near you, the tent would also probrably be to far away to walk to school-- which I really like doing. There would be no room of my own and no room to do homework in . Some bad things about the tent itself is that the surface usually gets wet in the morning. It is very destructable also-- any strong wind can blow a tent down. These are some of the reasons I think living in a tent is terrible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)